Scattering across systems and files
When the same operation has to be reviewed in several sources, response time increases and control weakens.
Services · Treasury assessment
We understand how your treasury operates before proposing anything.
A structured 1 to 2 hour session to map how your operation works today: instruments, processes, systems and friction points. At the end you receive a report with concrete findings and a closing meeting with recommendations. No purchase commitment, no product pitch.
What the assessment identifies
Real problems before talking about technology.
The assessment does not start with a solution. It starts with questions about how your treasury operates today.
Manual tracking by instrument
Without a common view, portfolios, money market, derivatives and currencies end up with fragmented traceability.
Reconciliation and closing with too many manual steps
Operational load grows when transactional evidence and process status are not centralized.
Audit and compliance pressure
Regulatory demands require evidence, context and the ability to respond quickly on critical financial processes.
How it works
One session. One report. One closing meeting.
The process is short and requires no prior preparation from the client.
Mapping session (1-2 hours)
A structured conversation with the treasury team to understand active instruments, closing processes, information sources, friction points and regulatory context.
Internal analysis
Based on the conversation, Alfa GL builds a map of the current operation, identifies risk and scattering hotspots, and prepares concrete, prioritized recommendations.
Written report + closing meeting
The client receives a document with findings and recommendations. The closing meeting allows each point to be explored in depth and questions about the way forward to be resolved.
What the report includes
Concrete findings, not generic conclusions.
Map of the current operation
A description of how information flows across instruments, systems and teams. It identifies where traceability breaks and which processes depend on unnecessary manual work.
Operational and regulatory risk hotspots
Points where scattering or the lack of centralization create risk of error, rework or inability to respond to an audit.
Prioritized improvement opportunities
Not a list of everything that could be done, but the changes with the greatest impact on daily control, operational load and the team's ability to respond.
Recommendations on the way forward
Which type of intervention makes the most sense given the context: process adjustments, system integration, or a more structured solution. Without assuming the answer is always new software.
Who it is for
The conversation changes with the team involved.
Treasury and trading desk
They need more daily control, a unified reading of the process and less friction between instruments and teams.
Risk, audit and compliance
They need evidence, traceability and the ability to respond on events, changes and operational states.
Technology and architecture
They need a sustainable foundation to integrate, evolve and sustain the operation without inheriting more complexity.
Next step
Let's talk about what you need to solve.
You don't need to have everything figured out from the start. Tell us the context of your operation and we book the session with the right person.